An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
Blog Article
[3] For example, in England, the High Court as well as the Court of Appeals are Each individual bound by their very own previous decisions, however, For the reason that Practice Statement 1966 the Supreme Court with the United Kingdom can deviate from its earlier decisions, Even though in practice it seldom does. A notable example of when the court has overturned its precedent is the case of R v Jogee, where the Supreme Court of your United Kingdom ruled that it and the other courts of England and Wales experienced misapplied the legislation for almost 30 years.
Some pluralist systems, such as Scots regulation in Scotland and types of civil legislation jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, don't exactly in shape into the dual common-civil legislation system classifications. These types of systems might have been greatly influenced by the Anglo-American common law tradition; however, their substantive legislation is firmly rooted during the civil law tradition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents of the boy or Female don't approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they might do if they might Slice off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who is a major, the few is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by legislation.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may perhaps find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
As the here Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been arrived at, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
PLR is actually a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
We've been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of regulation and also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of the United States and this State.
Only the written opinions in the Supreme Court and also the Court of Appeals are routinely obtainable. Decisions on the decrease (trial) courts usually are not generally published or distributed.
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by regulation." It's very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account from the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does supply for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set with the government.
Problems or Errors In the event you encounter any technical problems with this website (such as a lousy link or simply a portion of the opinion lacking), please notify the eService Middle.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It's also a very well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.